[Standards] XEP-0297 review

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Tue Jul 17 08:39:28 UTC 2012

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> I've just reviewed XEP-0297 (Stanza Forwarding) and I think it looks
> good. One small comment, it would be good to describe briefly the kinds
> of extensions that might re-use this format, and specifically to cite
> draft-miller-xmpp-e2e.
> In Sections 4.1 and 4.2, we use the word "trust", which I find to be
> void for vagueness and thus impossible to operationalize. IMHO it would
> be better to phrase this in terms of how the receiving entity needs to
> behave (e.g., drop the message without showing it to a human).

"An entity cannot trust that forwards are genuine when receiving them
unprovoked (i.e. outside the scope of another specification) and
SHOULD NOT process them automatically."



More information about the Standards mailing list