[Standards] Comments on Chat Markers

Spencer MacDonald spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com
Tue Jul 9 11:07:57 UTC 2013


I have updated the XEP based on the feedback.

Regards

Spencer


On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Spencer MacDonald <
spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com> wrote:

>  No your correct, I was trying to stick to the naming from other XEPs but
> it doesn't quite fit.
>
> Regards
>
> Spencer
>
> On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:57, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Spencer MacDonald
> <spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Before I send in my update with the above changes, I am think about adding
> a
> requirement that all messages that can be marked, should have an "allowed"
> child element.
>
> <allowed xmlns='urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0'>
>
> This means that messages containing only Chat States, Delivery Receipts etc
> are not included in Chat Markers and this will network traffic for
> redundant
> Chat Markers.
>
> Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>
>
> Sounds reasonable - although I'm not sure 'allowed' represents what
> you're trying to express (or I didn't understand). Would 'markable' be
> better?
>
> /K
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20130709/0c91d9c1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xep-chat-markers-4.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 16858 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20130709/0c91d9c1/attachment.xml>


More information about the Standards mailing list