[Standards] Comments on Chat Markers

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Jul 9 15:31:08 UTC 2013


The revised proposal has been pushed to the inbox:

http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/chat-markers.html

Peter

On 7/9/13 5:07 AM, Spencer MacDonald wrote:
> I have updated the XEP based on the feedback.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Spencer
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Spencer MacDonald
> <spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com
> <mailto:spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     No your correct, I was trying to stick to the naming from other XEPs
>     but it doesn't quite fit.
> 
>     Regards
> 
>     Spencer
> 
>     On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:57, Kevin Smith wrote:
> 
>>     On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Spencer MacDonald
>>     <spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>     Before I send in my update with the above changes, I am think
>>>     about adding a
>>>     requirement that all messages that can be marked, should have an
>>>     "allowed"
>>>     child element.
>>>
>>>     <allowed xmlns='urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0'>
>>>
>>>     This means that messages containing only Chat States, Delivery
>>>     Receipts etc
>>>     are not included in Chat Markers and this will network traffic
>>>     for redundant
>>>     Chat Markers.
>>>
>>>     Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>>
>>     Sounds reasonable - although I'm not sure 'allowed' represents what
>>     you're trying to express (or I didn't understand). Would 'markable' be
>>     better?
>>
>>     /K
> 
> 


-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/





More information about the Standards mailing list