[Standards] Comments on Chat Markers
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Jul 9 15:31:08 UTC 2013
The revised proposal has been pushed to the inbox:
On 7/9/13 5:07 AM, Spencer MacDonald wrote:
> I have updated the XEP based on the feedback.
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Spencer MacDonald
> <spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com
> <mailto:spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com>> wrote:
> No your correct, I was trying to stick to the naming from other XEPs
> but it doesn't quite fit.
> On Sunday, 7 July 2013 at 08:57, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Spencer MacDonald
>> <spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com
>> <mailto:spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Before I send in my update with the above changes, I am think
>>> about adding a
>>> requirement that all messages that can be marked, should have an
>>> child element.
>>> <allowed xmlns='urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0'>
>>> This means that messages containing only Chat States, Delivery
>>> Receipts etc
>>> are not included in Chat Markers and this will network traffic
>>> for redundant
>>> Chat Markers.
>>> Does anyone have an opinion on this?
>> Sounds reasonable - although I'm not sure 'allowed' represents what
>> you're trying to express (or I didn't understand). Would 'markable' be
More information about the Standards