[Standards] presence TTL

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Tue Jul 16 21:24:27 UTC 2013


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Justin Karneges <justin at affinix.com> wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 11:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>
>> On 7/15/13 11:31 PM, Justin Karneges wrote:
>>>
>>> I wonder if it couldn't hurt to standardize a simple thing like this?
>>>
>>> <presence from="alice" to="bob">
>>>    <status>I'm here</status>
>>>    <ttl xmlns="urn:xmpp:tmp:ttl">600</ttl>
>>> </presence>
>>>
>>> Given the above directed presence, Bob would expect another presence
>>> stanza from Alice within 10 minutes.
>>
>>
>> Seems useful.
>>
>> Would it apply only to presence?
>
>
> In proposing this I had intended it only for presence, but if anyone is
> interested in defining the meaning of a TTL on non-presence stanzas then I
> don't see any harm in overloading.

Does this interact with PSA at all?

/K



More information about the Standards mailing list