[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Chat Markers
mwild1 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 20:09:41 UTC 2013
On 20 June 2013 09:23, Spencer MacDonald
<spencer.macdonald.other at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would personally be happy with either solution, but if we keep the no body
> rule for backwards compatibility, wouldn't we require "positive" message
> processing hints too, for when we want to archive a message with no body?
> i.e. allow-permanent-storage, allow-storage, allow-copy
Yes, if we kept the rule then I would add such hints. However as I
noted in my message, I think I'd rather remove it. And there isn't
really anything to keep backwards compatibility with.
More information about the Standards