[Standards] Fwd: Veto against namespaces protoXEP

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Apr 22 16:43:42 UTC 2015


I'll discuss this with the protoXEP author; I suspect he'll be quite


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>
Date: 22 April 2015 at 17:42
Subject: Veto against namespaces protoXEP
To: XMPP Council <council at xmpp.org>

There is some possibility that XEP-0001 might be interpreted such that my
protoXEP would go through by default; for the avoidance of doubt I'm
therefore placing a veto on this until (at least) the next Council meeting.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20150422/b98efc38/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list