[Standards] Move CSI to Last Call ("Proposed")
flo at geekplace.eu
Tue Jul 28 09:23:54 UTC 2015
On 28.07.2015 11:11, Edwin Mons wrote:
> On 28/07/15 11:05, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> > Also, why wrap the server notification in a message,
>> And not using a Nonza? Because most libraries provide a mechanism for
>> callbacks matching a given filter only for Stanzas. It's my impression
>> as as XMPP client library developer, that we don't want Nonzas to
>> trigger callbacks on the client side, as it would increase the
>> complexity of XMPP client software stacks.
>> It's very wrong.
>> Consider a case where the client goes active, then switches to
>> inactive but loses connection and recovers via '198. The response -
>> which is tightly bound to the session - would indicate that the client
>> was inactive, but would arrive on a subsequent connection which is not
> If you're doing in-band signalling, you really need to be able to
> distinguish signals from actual data. If you use stanzas, you're making
> it very hard for yourself.
Why? A stanza can contain data, a signal or even both. I see no problem
there. You can distinguish the signal('s data) from the (real) data by
extension elements used witin stanza.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards