[Standards] XEP-0060: be more consistent with reply #106
stefan.strigler at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 08:48:38 UTC 2015
when implementing parts of XEP-0060 I came across a maybe inconsistency
when it's about unsubscribing from a Node (Section 6.2.2 -
If we'd allow to also have a the resulting subscription element in the
response, the implementation can be kept more generic, you always reply
with the resulting status of the subscription, no matter if it was a
subscribe or an unsubscribe.
Thus my PR at
I am aware that for unsubscribing the additional information given is
redundant. That's why I changed it to MAY after I first suggested a SHOULD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards