[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Message Encryption
zash at zash.se
Thu Aug 18 12:00:23 UTC 2016
On 2016-08-18 13:09, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
> On that basis, maybe I could make @name optional, as in “MAY NOT be
> included for those three XEPs already listed”, “SHOULD for any
> mechanism not listed here”, and “SHOULD be ignored on a received
> message if you already have a correct name for it and can present it to
> the user”?
> Anyway, no matter the solution chosen, I will include the reasoning and
> other solutions that have not been taken in the next revision of this
A registry of i18n'd names might be useful as a shared resource
somewhere, so you could look up an appropriate name based on the namespace.
Kim "Zash" Alvefur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards