[Standards] XEP-0375: View from Openfire

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Tue Jul 12 16:35:50 UTC 2016

On 12 July 2016 at 17:31, Sam Whited <sam at samwhited.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> > Sure, we do. But nobody can implement MIX right now, so it's a waste of
> time
> > trying to put it into a Compliance Suite as anything more than a mention
> > that we're expecting it to be in the next revision, perhaps.
> It's already in there, so I don't see it as a waste of time, that's a
> sunk cost :)
I didn't mean *your* time... :-)

> If someone came out with a server that only supported MIX (and not
> MUC) tomorrow, I would see no reason not to call them compliant since
> they support group chat (which is the "feature" that MIX/MUC are
> listed under), so I see no reason why we shouldn't include it unless
> we're suggesting that you really do *have* to have MUC specifically
> and not just "group chat"?
I'm suggesting we have to have MUC specifically. If a server can implement
any specification they like for any of these features, then Skype qualifies.

> —Sam
> --
> Sam Whited
> pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
> https://blog.samwhited.com
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20160712/3d58d76b/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list