[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0363 (HTTP File Upload)
jonas at wielicki.name
Mon Dec 4 11:36:50 UTC 2017
On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 09:53:59 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> I was considering to just move it up by one level. Validation may or
> may not be an issue but I figured some libraries won't have a
> getExtension or getChildren method on the error class if they don't
> expect the class to have children.
> Are there any other examples of XEPs 'extending' the error element?
FWIW, the semantics of "it can be retried later" are essentially encoded in
Extending the error element in this way feels weird, because as you say it is
not a condition but an instruction, and implementations won’t expect this.
I also find it kind of weird to update a XEP which is currently under last
call. That makes it a moving target to comment against.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Standards