[Standards] 2017-11-29 XMPP Council Meeting Minutes
kevin.smith at isode.com
Wed Dec 6 16:34:49 UTC 2017
On 6 Dec 2017, at 16:30, Sam Whited <sam at samwhited.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, at 06:28, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On that basis, I do feel like we should probably do things properly and
>> re-issue the LC, so I’m -1 on advancement without that step.
> What value do you expect to get from reissuing a LC? Do we expect more
> feedback this time around?
The motivation in xep1 is that the outgoing Council members might have not given public feedback, due to being on Council, but that they could have feedback that should be taken into account. For the sake of two weeks, I’m not sure it’s worth shortcutting giving that opportunity here.
More information about the Standards