[Standards] 2017-11-29 XMPP Council Meeting Minutes
kevin.smith at isode.com
Wed Dec 6 17:03:16 UTC 2017
> On 6 Dec 2017, at 16:39, Sam Whited <sam at samwhited.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, at 10:34, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> The motivation in xep1 is that the outgoing Council members might have
>> not given public feedback, due to being on Council, but that they could
>> have feedback that should be taken into account. For the sake of two
>> weeks, I’m not sure it’s worth shortcutting giving that opportunity here.
> I don't think the two weeks matters necessarily but everyone on the
> council now was previously a member and could have given feedback. If
> they didn't then, I don't see why being on the council would make a
It’s the opposite case that xep1 is concerned with. A Council member might decide not to give feedback on standards@, knowing that they can give such feedback when voting, and such when they’re not on Council their not-yet-voiced comments might fail to be heard.
I suppose the compromise here would be for the outgoing Council to confirm they’ve no more feedback, and then I’ll rescind my -1 on that basis.
> Standing on procedure like this is one of the reasons we lose things
> around the time of the council transition and why things end up stuck in
> a loop and never moving forward. On the one hand, I will make sure that
> doesn't happen this time, on the other hand I don't like process for
> processes sake and am very dissapointed that we still can't move forward
> with this.
> I was very much hoping to get a final vote on this by the end of the
> year and with the holidays fast approaching I very much doubt that will
> happen if we put it through LC again.
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
More information about the Standards