[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0423 (XMPP Compliance Suites 2020)

Georg Lukas georg at op-co.de
Wed Nov 6 08:25:13 UTC 2019


Hi goffi,

* goffi <goffi at goffi.org> [2019-11-05 22:58]:
> I'm really busy these days and couldn't do an extensive review, but here is
> my feedback:

Thank you for your feedback!

> It's really chat focused, and I would like to see other categories, notably
> a "social" one. I would put there XEP-0277 as the bare minimum, and RSM for
> PubSub + MAM for Pubsub for advanced clients.

Unfortunately, I'm veeeeeery time-bound this week, but I need to bring
the Draft proposal up in today's Council. I would very kindly ask you,
and everybody else involved in Social IM, to provide a PR, or a
free-form table that corresponds to our typical Core/Advanced
distinction with different labeled entries, in the next days / weeks. We
can then add it into the Draft XEP under the new Council.

> Why Jingle SOCKS5 Bytestreams Transport Method (XEP-0260) is missing from
> the list while XEP-0261 is there?

XEP-0234 requires support for 0261 at a minimum, and mentions 0260 as
recommended, so it should be discoverable by prospective developers. The
Compliance Suite doesn't have a notion for "recommended", so everything
listed there must be implemented, on the other hand.


Georg
-- 
|| http://op-co.de ++  GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N  ++
|| gpg: 0x962FD2DE ||  o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+  ||
|| Ge0rG: euIRCnet ||  X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y?   ||
++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20191106/81fe8bff/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list