[Standards] XEP-0288 - Bidi - Maybe CFE?

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Tue Sep 3 10:55:18 UTC 2019

Thanks for your snappy response.

On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 18:13, Ruslan Marchenko <me at ruff.mobi> wrote:

> Hi,
> Am 11.01.2019 um 15:04 schrieb Philipp Hancke:
> > Am 18.12.18 um 09:45 schrieb Dave Cridland:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I'm thinking of asking the Editor to issue a Call For Experience on
> >> XEP-0288.
> >>
> >> I would do so now, but I'm not entirely sure who actually implements it.
> >>
> >> So, who does implement it? (And is your implementation open source)?
> >
> > I did, a long time ago in psyced. Its opensource but hasn't changed in
> > ages. I still use it and it continues to work -- even though i seem to
> > have had quite some issues with Dave's server at times.
> >
> > Its still useful, I always considered one-way s2s a bug caused by weak
> > (or lacking) authentication mechanism in the initial design.
> >
> I've recently realized my bidi implementation lacks SASL External
> outbound support - but when trying to implement it I figured my bidi
> external test now fails because the target I used earlier for BIDI
> end2end test (metronome.im) now dropped its support. So now wonder
> whether there's any known issue with this so that no one supports it in
> the wild? I have always thought this is the future state of s2s and
> sooner or later everyone would move to it but it looks quite opposite.


OK, how about this - is there any interest in running an interopathon
across a few days where people have bidi-enabled domains available?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20190903/59dbe6a4/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list