[Standards] Message Retractions

Lance Stout lancestout at gmail.com
Wed Sep 4 15:38:45 UTC 2019

> I don't see any specific reason in the archives why the XEP wasn't advanced,
> except that apparently enthusiasm for it fizzled out.
> I'm not the author of the proposed XEP, but I'd like to see whether this can be
> moved forward and I hereby offer to make any changes necessary to get it
> accepted (unless Lance would like to do so himself).

Consider the XEP yours now. :)

The piece that was important to me was MUC moderation, allowing mods/admins
to remove spam/inappropriate messages. But there were a bunch of question marks
for how well the proposed XEP actually covered those cases, and then it fizzled out.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20190904/27b9d52d/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list