[Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-08-06
jonas at wielicki.name
Wed Sep 11 15:22:22 UTC 2019
On Freitag, 6. September 2019 16:47:23 CEST Sam Whited wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, at 10:08, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > I’ve instead submitted a fastening protoXEP that Reactions can use to
> > allay my concerns. If that is published, I’m amenable to accepting
> > reactions as-is and immediately updating it to use fastening
> > (providing we agreed that me doing so was appropriate), or for the
> > authors to update pre-publish.
> At a quick glance this seems broadly similar to XEP-0367: Message
> Attaching, would it be better to just add you as an author and you can
> add external payloads to that instead of having yet another XEP that
> does the same thing and muddies the waters when people are trying to
> figure out what they should use to actually implement a feature?
I recall you stating in the past that Message Attaching would not be fit to
general referencing use-cases (such as Emoji Reactions), which is what
Fastening aims at.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Standards