[Standards] XEP-0313: pending 0.7 update review
flo at geekplace.eu
Wed Apr 22 11:16:21 UTC 2020
On 4/22/20 12:07 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 15:50, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu
> <mailto:flo at geekplace.eu>> wrote:
> On 4/21/20 2:32 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 16:20,
> > You're going to hate me, but one more thing...
> > Current MAM says that servers SHOULD include a count. The problem with
> > this is that it's extremely slow on any system with more than trivial
> > retention periods, since this tends to degenerate into either a
> > SQL query (table-scan-tastic) or a standalone counter (which then
> > and is a contention point).
> > The majority of client libraries appear to ignore the count values
> > anyway, as far as I can tell, so can we relax this to a MAY? (XEP-0059
> > is MAY-but-only-if, which is arguably really a SHOULD anyway).
> I think such a relaxation would require a namespace bump.
> I'm not convinced. In any case, servers that already comply with the
> SHOULD will probably continue to do so, new servers may be more likely
> not to, but given that clients don't really use the (unreliable) info
> today then I don't think we lose anything in practice.
I could follow that argumentation in this case. It's probably just me,
but I am very conservative when it comes to relaxations of keywords.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards