[Standards] Council Minutes 2020-05-27
sam at samwhited.com
Mon Jun 1 17:01:32 UTC 2020
Not that it really matters, but to be pedantic and correct my own
mistake: I mentioned connected scripts, this is not correct. That is a
Zero width joiner, of course. ZWS is used in languages that don't put
spaces between words to indicate word boundaries, which is of course a
different thing. I had a brain fart.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, at 12:59, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, at 11:58, Marvin W wrote:
> > PS: As a sending client you can already opt-out using a hack: By
> > prepending the opening (and, if needed, closing) styling
> > directive with zero-width space (U+200B)
> I hadn't actually thought of this. I'll need to think about it more,
> but we might recommend this in the spec since this is the exact use
> case zero width spaces are for (things that are word boundaries but
> where spaces don't necessarily go, between characters that shouldn't
> be put together in connected scripts, etc. My only concern would be
> that they also have the meaning "you can add a soft break here" which
> is probably *not* what you want in this case.
> I'll think about it more, but this is definitely at least close to the
> point of a zero-width space and might be worth documenting.
> Sam Whited
More information about the Standards