[Standards] Adding namespaced content to Registry entries
flo at geekplace.eu
Thu Jun 4 19:18:23 UTC 2020
On 6/3/20 5:25 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote:> Hi everyone,
> Flow and I got in a discussion about whether it is OK to add foreign,
> namespaced elements to Registry entries.
I think registry entries should be just as extensible as the elements
that are registered. This would also align nicely with the spirit of
extensibility of XMPP. In this  particular example, it mimics how
data form validation extend form fields on the wire protocol, at the
A situation where additional requirements and further information is
only part of the textual specification and not of the registry entry,
when it *could* be part of the entry, appears undesirable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards