[Summit] XEP dependency graph

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Jul 29 10:14:21 UTC 2013


On 7/27/13 10:20 PM, Yusuke DOI wrote:
> Dear folks,
> 
> There was discussion about 'tagging' XEPs today. It's important to add
> tags somehow, but I think we don't have where to start for now. To
> bootstrap the classification of XEPs, I've wrote a tiny script to
> extract dependency and gave it to graphviz.
> 
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzmV2k-V-sECNktwX1U0a2hHQTA/edit?usp=sharing

Cool. :-)

> Here's top 18 list of most referenced XEPs and other documents.:
> (refcnt>=6)
> 
>     256 XMPP Core
>      67 XMPP IM
>      67 XEP-0030
>      27 XEP-0060
>      22 XEP-0045
>      22 XEP-0004
>      21 XEP-0001
>      19 XEP-0163
>      18 XEP-0166
>      13 XEP-0115
>       9 XEP-0082
>       9 XEP-0054
>       8 XEP-0167
>       8 XEP-0068
>       6 XEP-0138
>       6 XEP-0124
>       6 XEP-0049
>       6 XEP-0016
> 
> An idea: Most referred document may have manually-configured tags
> (keywords), and the keywords can propagated through dependency graph to
> set 'default set of keywords' if the XEP has no manually-set tags.
> 
> Hoping it helps.
> 

It does.

I'm interested in seeing how the tagging might help. But to know what
"help" means we need to figure out what we're trying to accomplish. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/




More information about the Summit mailing list