[Jabber-IETF] Agenda items

Peter Millard me at pgmillard.com
Mon Oct 7 12:38:39 CDT 2002


Iain Shigeoka wrote:
> On 10/7/02 8:58 AM, "Pete Chown" <1 at 234.cx> wrote:
>> Do you think this work should be included in the RFCs that we
>> prepare? Are we going to be specifying Jabber as it is used right
>> now, or developing a new revision of the Jabber protocol?
>
> I believe the idea for the current IETF work is to standardize what
> we have now. So any JNG oriented work would be done under a new WG.
> I'm definitely not the right person to answer such scope questions
> though.

It was my understanding that the IETF WG is specifically NOT geared towards
working on some new binary framing protocol. Per the charter, it is supposed
to standardize the work and implementations already "in-the-wild", based on
the current protocols as documented in the I-D's.

pgm.




More information about the xmppwg mailing list