14 Oct
2024
14 Oct
'24
10:10 a.m.
Hi all,
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move our mailman installation
from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing so, we also plan
to delete some lists that are no longer in use or that could be replaced
with chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep this list for coordination
among server operators, or could we use the operators@ chatroom instead?
Peter
14 Oct
14 Oct
10:26 a.m.
I've moved on from XMPP to running a car club and there's so little chat here
I'm happy either way but best to drop me off the list anyway.
It was great knowing you all at arms length, I hope life has and will treat you all well.
Kind regards,
David.
- The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service
—
Mobile: 0782 5138 214
Email: david(a)banes.org
https://davidbanes.com
https://cleartextsystems.com
https://hellfiremotorvehicle.club
On 14 Oct 2024 at 17:19 +0100, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im>im>, wrote:
Hi all,
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move our mailman installation
from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing so, we also plan
to delete some lists that are no longer in use or that could be replaced
with chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep this list for coordination
among server operators, or could we use the operators@ chatroom instead?
Peter
10:37 a.m.
Am 14.10.2024 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im>im>:
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move our
mailman installation from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing so, we also
plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or that could be replaced with
chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep this list for coordination among server operators,
or could we use the operators@ chatroom instead?
I would like to keep this list. Maybe not everyone has joined the MUC, maybe there might
be a reason of needing a second channel to communicate, for example when there is a larger
outage or similar that is preventing the use of XMPP.
Additionally some topics may be better discussed via mail.
My 2 cents...
--
Ciao... // Web: http://blog.windfluechter.net
Ingo \X/ XMPP/Jabber: ij(a)jhookipa.net
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc
10:55 a.m.
On 10/14/24 10:37 AM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
Am 14.10.2024 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter(a)stpeter.im>im>:
Good points. Keeping this list is probably advisable.
Peter
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move
our mailman installation from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing so, we
also plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or that could be replaced with
chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep this list for coordination among server operators,
or could we use the operators@ chatroom instead?
I would like to keep this list. Maybe not everyone has joined the MUC, maybe there might
be a reason of needing a second channel to communicate, for example when there is a larger
outage or similar that is preventing the use of XMPP.
Additionally some topics may be better discussed via mail. 
10:56 a.m.
Il 14/10/2024 18:55, Peter Saint-Andre ha scritto:
On 10/14/24 10:37 AM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
I also agree.
--
roughnecks
https://woodpeckersnest.space
gemini://woodpeckersnest.space
Am 14.10.2024 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter(a)stpeter.im>im>:
Good points. Keeping this list is probably advisable.
Peter
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move
our mailman
installation from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing
so, we also plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or
that could be replaced with chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep
this list for coordination among server operators, or could we use
the operators@ chatroom instead?
I would like to keep this list. Maybe not everyone has joined the MUC,
maybe there might be a reason of needing a second channel to
communicate, for example when there is a larger outage or similar that
is preventing the use of XMPP.
Additionally some topics may be better discussed via mail. 
10:58 a.m.
What is this about?
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024, 12:55 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im> wrote:
On 10/14/24 10:37 AM, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
Am 14.10.2024 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter(a)stpeter.im>im>:
> The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move our mailman
installation from
a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing so, we
also plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or that could be
replaced with chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep this list for
coordination among server operators, or could we use the operators@
chatroom instead?
I would like to keep this list. Maybe not everyone has joined the MUC,
maybe there
might be a reason of needing a second channel to communicate,
for example when there is a larger outage or similar that is preventing the
use of XMPP.
Additionally some topics may be better discussed
via mail.
Good points. Keeping this list is probably advisable.
Peter
2:29 p.m.
I would like to add that the operators muc is still unusable (for some
people) due to the affiliation bot being absent. I asked jonas about
this already and he said he would have someone fix it, it has been a few
days and it is still not fixed, nor have i been given an affiliation.
3:21 p.m.
+1
On 14.10.24 18:37, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
Am 14.10.2024 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre
<stpeter(a)stpeter.im>im>:
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move
our mailman installation from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing so, we
also plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or that could be replaced with
chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep this list for coordination among server operators,
or could we use the operators@ chatroom instead?
I would like to keep this list. Maybe not everyone has joined the MUC, maybe there
might be a reason of needing a second channel to communicate, for example when there is a
larger outage or similar that is preventing the use of XMPP.
Additionally some topics may be better discussed via mail.
My 2 cents...
15 Oct
15 Oct
8:01 a.m.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:10:03 -0600
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im> wrote:
Hi all,
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move our mailman
installation from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing
so, we also plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or
that could be replaced with chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep
this list for coordination among server operators, or could we use
the operators@ chatroom instead?
Hi Peter,
As a non-contributor I don't feel I have a vote but would you mind
posting the full JID of the chatroom that's supposed to replace this
list? Is it public or do I need to be a part of the organization?
Regards
9:09 a.m.
On 10/15/24 8:01 AM, GDR! wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:10:03 -0600
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter(a)stpeter.im> wrote:
There's a link to the "operators" chatroom here:
https://xmpp.org/community/chat/
Peter
Hi all,
The XSF infrastructure team is planning to move our mailman
installation from a dedicated machine to a cloud service. When doing
so, we also plan to delete some lists that are no longer in use or
that could be replaced with chatrooms. Do we feel the need to keep
this list for coordination among server operators, or could we use
the operators@ chatroom instead?
Hi Peter,
As a non-contributor I don't feel I have a vote but would you mind
posting the full JID of the chatroom that's supposed to replace this
list? Is it public or do I need to be a part of the organization?
64
days inactive
65
days old
9 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
anarc.host admins -
David Banes -
GDR! -
Ingo Jürgensmann -
Matthias Wimmer -
Melinda Thompson -
Peter Saint-Andre -
roughnecks