I have setup the membership application Wiki page for the application
period Q4 2024
Applications are encouraged from developers and others who are actively
involved in the Jabber/XMPP community. To apply, create a page about
yourself on the Wiki at:
https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_Q4_2024
If you don't have a wiki account, send your full name, preferred
nickname and email address to me or one of the other Sysops:
https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Sysops
Apply now!!!
Thanks,
Alex
Good day!
I am working on Rivista[1], which is a journal publisher for XMPP.
I test instances of Libervia and Movim against Rivista.
Most of the tests are conducted against the official instance of Movim.
The matter of this message is concerning to Adding a Comment[2] (clause
3.2 to XEP-0277).
I have noticed that "reactions" are manifested exactly the same as
comments, inside element title.
The couple of indications that a comment is a reaction are:
1) Element title has a single character; or
2) The character or character combination is included in the range of
characters that are dedicated for reactions.
I would suggest to use a classifier.
1) Use element title as a classifier of post type, either a comment or
a reaction, and use element summary as a handler for the comment
itself; or
2) Use element category (e.g. xmpp:comment and xmpp:reaction); or
3) Utilize "Extension Elements" (clause 6.4 to RFC 4287).
I think that solution #3 would be the ideal solution.
Current
-------
<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<author>
<name>Juliet Capulet</name>
<uri>xmpp:juliet@capulet.lit</uri>
</author>
<title type='text'>She is so pretty!</title>
<published>2008-05-08T18:39:02Z</published>
</entry>
Title as an indicator
---------------------
<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<author>
<name>Juliet Capulet</name>
<uri>xmpp:juliet@capulet.lit</uri>
</author>
<title type='text'>comment</title>
<summary type='text'>She is so pretty!</summary>
<published>2008-05-08T18:39:02Z</published>
</entry>
Category as an indicator
------------------------
<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<author>
<name>Juliet Capulet</name>
<uri>xmpp:juliet@capulet.lit</uri>
</author>
<title type='text'>She is so pretty!</title>
<category term='xmpp:comment'/>
<published>2008-05-08T18:39:02Z</published>
</entry>
A dedicated extension
---------------------
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:reactions="http://xmpp.org/2024/reactions">
For comments:
<!-- Custom Reactions Extension -->
<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<author>
<name>Juliet Capulet</name>
<uri>xmpp:juliet@capulet.lit</uri>
</author>
<title type='text'>She is so pretty!</title>
<reactions:reaction type="💡️"/>
<reactions:reaction type="👍️"/>
<published>2008-05-08T18:39:02Z</published>
</entry>
For posts:
<!-- Custom Reactions Extension -->
<reactions:reaction type="✒️" count="10"/>
<reactions:reaction type="💡️" count="2"/>
<reactions:reaction type="👍️" count="5"/>
Kind regards,
Schimon
[1]: https://git.xmpp-it.net/sch/Rivista
[2]: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0277.html#comment_add
Hi,
At the moment, it is not recommended to provide a web registration URL
if the server supports account creation via IBR.
I created https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1299 to provide a web
registration URL in addition to account creation via IBR. The client or
user can decide which one to choose.
Please let me know what you think about it.
To the Council:
1. What exactly do you mean by *The language is weird*?
2. I tried to describe the use case. Could you please explain your
doubts?
3. Why would such a change be problematic for a final XEP?
4. Where should I add that change instead?
Thanks in advance :)