Well, on the other hand, since the only scenario I can imagine using <acknowledged/> in the wild has significantly different semantics from readdisplayed markers, I think that this is not really necessary in this XEP. On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 17:34, Daniel Gultsch <daniel@gultsch.de> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:
3) It's really not. Some clients and intermediaries need to know whether they should expect a marker or not. No need to check this prior to sending a <markable/>, true, but useful to track missing markers afterward.
Where was the discussion of this, and (more broadly) how does one know what the discussion and rationale and consensus is if not on this list?
I can add it back. When I showed this to people in the XSF room I guess most people just considered the "does it hurt to opportunistically include the <markable/>" side of things. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave@xmpp.org