With respect. Do you realize that I do not intend to consider yor statement. To me, any of your statements is routinely revoked. The terrible discrimination of software UWPX in favour of your unmaintained software, which I do not even intend to mention, is an event which obviously displays the blatant conflict-of-interest, which is certainly not for the general good. Do not try to shield misconducts by words of diversity. The fact that Africans, Asians, and South Americans are not as involved with XMPP is a concern which must be cared for. Please. To avoid from wasting your own time. Do not respond to my messages, and I further advise to refrain from stating anything forand against me. I shall ignore any further message from you. Also, to remind you, this is a concern of moderating messages, nothing else more. I have explained, in detail, to Mr. Guus der Kinderen, about the reason which prompted me to discuss of further concerns in relation to the subject matter. If you want to discuss of other concerns, that are not of moderating of messages, then you should do so in the appropriate arena. Not here. Schimon On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:18:06 +0200 Georg Lukas <georg@op-co.de> wrote:
Dear Schimon,
writing on behalf of the modteam:
Spam is an issue with which all open online venues have to struggle. Historically, the defenses implemented against spam have been sufficient. This has changed recently and iteam is working on understanding why that has changed and is looking into options to improve the situation without making the hurdles for new posters unreasonably high.
XMPP is being more and more exclusive to certain groups of people, while shunning others; and negligence, be it intentional or unintentional (e.g. this instance of undesired messages), is severely bad and suggests of deliberate sabotage by hostile elements within XSF, whoever those may be.
We are all committed to inclusion and diversity of the community, and we are open to constructive suggestions on how to become more inclusive. The XSF is driven by volunteers, on limited time and capacity. Suggesting that there are hostile elements within the XSF working against XMPP is a serious accusation, and nothing here supports it. Please abstain from further unfounded speculations of this sort.
Georg (on behalf of modteam)