No one has to
implement Jingle File Transfer
XEP-0385 says "a client supporting this XEP MUST implement Jingle File
Transfer (XEP-0234)". I'm not sure how to not read that as a MUST.
Right but we're not talking about supporting that XEP, but rather a totally
different XEP (sims) which uses part of the same vocabulary.
It also shows again why having the metadata
element in its own XEP is a good idea
I'm not picky how we break up the XEPs per se, though some have an idea that
a namespace definition should be tied to a single XEP.
--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph