While I do appreciate some of the publication of IETF, I do not think that it deserves any attention, especially not our attention, of the people of XMPP, for the IETF has rejected Atomsub (Atom Over XMPP). I do sense, that we should further incorporate more PPN (Peer-to-peer Network) means into XMPP, and let thise "HTTP people" to "play" with their own "soup", for a lack of a better phrase. Lest forget that in the past those organizations have formed the "Peer-to-peer Working Group" (peer-to-peerwg.org) in order to gradually suppress P2P, not to promote it. Schimon On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 13:42:31 -0600 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
No, the subject line of this message is not a joke. :-)
The IETF has formed a "TIPTOP" working group to study and adapt Internet protocols for communication over interplanetary distances. [1] If anyone here is interested in this topic, I encourage you read their documents [2] and sign up for their email discussion list [3].
Thanks for your attention!
Peter
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tiptop/about/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tiptop/documents/ [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/deepspace/ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave@xmpp.org