Hey folks,
Travis pointed out a "bug" in ejabberd around the ordering of SASL2
elements, because XEP-0388 uses xs:sequence
I suspect this isn't a bug in ejabberd, but a bug in XEP-0388 for
using xs:sequence instead of xs:all - I suspect I wrote this and was
just being rubbish at writing schemas, and didn't intend to impose an
ordering, much less have receiving implementations depend on it.
How much pain would it be to just change it?
Dave.