Would it be relevant to also include PubSub nodes?
As stated in the introduction, I would ideally like this specification
to stay narrow-scoped and short, so I would rather let it stay focused
on a "collection of room", using existing mechanisms as much as possible.
That said, adding another type of entities in the list returned by
disco#items on a space sounds very possible, maybe with a namespaced
"spaces:type" attribute for the <items>, or by running addressing
disco#items directed at different node, eg, "space#pubsub-nodes". Why
not, but again, I would like to avoid falling into the perfect,
extensive solution that no one will implement.
Having an editable collection of rooms would already be a nice addition
for our MUC services IMHO.
-- nicoco