Nicolas, I thank you very much for your respond.
~ Schimon
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:40:03 +0100
Nicolas Cedilnik <nicoco(a)nicoco.fr> wrote:
Would it be
relevant to also include PubSub nodes?
As stated in the introduction, I would ideally like this
specification to stay narrow-scoped and short, so I would rather let
it stay focused on a "collection of room", using existing mechanisms
as much as possible.
That said, adding another type of entities in the list returned by
disco#items on a space sounds very possible, maybe with a namespaced
"spaces:type" attribute for the <items>, or by running addressing
disco#items directed at different node, eg, "space#pubsub-nodes". Why
not, but again, I would like to avoid falling into the perfect,
extensive solution that no one will implement.
Having an editable collection of rooms would already be a nice
addition for our MUC services IMHO.
-- nicoco
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards(a)xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave(a)xmpp.org