Nicolas, I thank you very much for your respond.
 ~ Schimon
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:40:03 +0100
Nicolas Cedilnik <nicoco(a)nicoco.fr> wrote:
   Would it be
relevant to also include PubSub nodes?   
 
 As stated in the introduction, I would ideally like this
 specification to stay narrow-scoped and short, so I would rather let
 it stay focused on a "collection of room", using existing mechanisms
 as much as possible.
 
 That said, adding another type of entities in the list returned by 
 disco#items on a space sounds very possible, maybe with a namespaced 
 "spaces:type" attribute for the <items>, or by running addressing 
 disco#items directed at different node, eg, "space#pubsub-nodes". Why 
 not, but again, I would like to avoid falling into the perfect, 
 extensive solution that no one will implement.
 
 Having an editable collection of rooms would already be a nice
 addition for our MUC services IMHO.
 
 -- nicoco
 
 _______________________________________________
 Standards mailing list -- standards(a)xmpp.org
 To unsubscribe send an email to standards-leave(a)xmpp.org