11 Mar
2024
11 Mar
'24
11:52 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 6:43 PM Stephen Paul Weber
<singpolyma(a)singpolyma.net> wrote:
What you are proposing depends on the message being archived. The
specification as written notably does not.
cheers
Daniel
* The server assist was added because of the
feature request that the
server parses <displayed xmlns="urn:xmpp:chat-markers:0"/>. However
this puts unnecessary burden on the server because the server then has
to look up the stanza-id from the message-id (which is used by
Displayed Markers (Chat Markers)). So with that feature request /
requirement in mind NOT allowing otherwise empty messages doesn’t take
anything away.
I would ideally prefer this burden on the server over the way it is specced
now, but there would need to be some way for the server to know that eg in
MUC the id is in fact the stanza id vs doing the lookup in MAM for non-MUC.