[Standards] Re: We should require AI disclosure

Hi, I’ve been lurking for a good year now, but this is finally something I can help with. Dne sreda, 13. maj 2026 ob 11:30:15 Srednjeevropski poletni čas je Dave Cridland napisal(a): I am a lawyer, I do specialize in IPR, specifically copyright and FOSS licensing, and I happen to have to deal with AI at work as well as have co- authored the FLA¹ – an actually balanced CLA. But I am not an attorney, so I cannot provide Legal Advice. Still, I can provide my thoughts, once we have a rough idea what we want to achieve with this. From what I followed the thread so far, Dave has already written a lot that I would have written too, so I will not repeat or rephrase that. Some short reading material on the topic for anyone interested: • <https://legallayer.substack.com/p/who-owns-the-claude-code-wrote> – a good, short intro into copyright in AI-generated stuff (mostly US-centric; and I would advise to use other tools than those mentioned) • <https://airisk.mit.edu/> – the most comprehensive overview of different AI risk, that I know of I will leave it at that for now, as I am neck-deep in work right now, but will keep an eye on this thread and come back with more later. cheers, Matija — ¹ https://fsfe.org/activities/fla/fla.en.html We are currently finalising FLA-2.1. The RC is already on GitHub, but we will wait for a few weeks more to gather some info about some details. -- gsm: tel:+386.41.849.552 www: https://matija.suklje.name xmpp: hook(a)campfire.wheremymonkeyis.at matrix: @hook:kompot.si