stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Aug 9 10:40:21 CDT 2007
Ian Paterson wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Do Council members think that we really need the friendly "How It Works"
>> section before 1.10 advances? I ask because I think the spec also needs
>> to be broken into more subsections, as I've done for rfc3920bis and
>> rfc3921bis, because many of the sections are quite long. This will take
>> me some time but I think it would be time well spent. I can try to do
>> that before the next Council meeting, but I would really like to get
>> these changes pushed out so that we can move forward with PEP etc.
> If you the changes are unlikely to be complete before the next meeting
> then, since they won't be normative, I'm +1 to publish now.
Just trying to figure out if I should dive in to a big task like that. I
think it would help developers quite a bit for the spec to be a bit more
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7354 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20070809/c03ecf65/attachment.bin
More information about the Council