[JDEV] Message timestamps
mass at ufl.edu
Mon Oct 4 13:32:20 CDT 1999
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Thomas Charron wrote:
> It was actually talked about, but no one ever made up a proposal for it.
> IMHO, it would be a great, optional thing to have, but the format should stick
> to the timestamp definitions that are part of RFC821. I'll include the snippet
> that deals with it below:
Ugh! please no, if you have control of the time stamp structure, don't
make it more complex by having a million optional formats.
More information about the JDev