[JDEV] Message timestamping and route tracking
david at fired-up.com
Tue Oct 5 06:04:45 CDT 1999
Well, I think the date/time format itself isn't that important - as long as
the clients know how the server is sending it, reformatting it is a piece of
>From: Lloyd Weehuizen <tuna at freeworldbbs.org>
>To: jdev at jabber.org
>Subject: Re: [JDEV] Message timestamping and route tracking
>Date: Tue, Oct 5, 1999, 12:19 AM
> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Scott Robinson wrote:
>> Oy! A simple discussion on timestamp format turns into routing issues. (the
>> following suggestions are in an unposted proposal) We obviously are to
>> damn smart.
> heheh I think this format is a very good idea, except I would argue to use
> the ISO standard rather than the RFC in this format as it seems to be
> waisting an awful lot of characters :)
>> <transport id="jabber:pagertransport://pager.mot.com/"
>> received="Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:35:52 -0700"
>> sent="Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:35:54 -0700">
>> Motorola Two-Way Paging Service
> <transport id="jabber:pagertransport://pager.mot.com/"
> Your Unique Caption Here
> Just my 2c worth :)
> <=- Lloyd Weehuizen -- tuna at cableaction.co.nz -=>
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
More information about the JDev