[JDEV] Question about licensing
tcharron at ductape.net
Thu Oct 7 11:48:42 CDT 1999
Quoting Isotope2k at aol.com:
> In a message dated 10/6/99 6:04:49 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> quad at jabber.org writes:
> What license is the protocol released under?
Erm, I'm not sure the protocol NEEDS to be licenced. If anyone tried to
patent/tradmark/etc the protocol itself, they would be in for a world of 'Prior
Art' clauses. I'd be interested in a more informed legal opinion then myself,
> If the point of releasing the protocol under a non-GPL license
> is to ensure that proprietary clients can be developed without
> enforcing the GPL on them, why not just add an addendum to
> the GPL license that allows for this?
IMHO, client using the protocol, or even clients making fucntion calls to the
LIBRARIES should be able to do so without conforming to the GPL. Someone
brought up the point about the libraries earlier, and I think this needs to be
addressed. Perhaps we should release the libs, etc under two distinct
licences, and allow the end user to choose? I know, I know, BIG can 'o worms
At least the perl modules will have no problems, they are distributed under
the artistic license, NOT the GPL..
> My primary concern here is that some corporate entity might
> eventually control the rights to the Jabber protocol and enforce
> restrictive or cost-oriented licenses. In other words, "sure, you
> can see the source code, but we OWN the mechanic."
This is a valid concern that, to be honest, I never even considered. Perhaps
we should make an 'Ask Slashdot' question up and see what the general Slashdot
<< Wanted: One decent sig >>
<< Preferably litle used >>
<< and stored in garage. ?>>
More information about the JDev