Bob La Quey robertl1 at home.com
Mon Apr 10 20:12:22 CDT 2000

At 07:59 PM 4/10/00 -0400, you wrote:
>    In a matter of speaking, yes..  ;-P
>    What I have looked at is using etherx as a router for SOAP requests,
>using the SOAP namespace within etherx jabber packets..
>    The best way I could think of to handle SOAP requests over the jabber
>protocol itself would be to have service provides embedding SOAP requests
>and responses within either InfoQuery tags using alternate namespaces as a
>transport, or to have clients utilizing one of the x tags..

I was thinking along the lines of having SOAP clients
using one of the x tags. Maybe something original 
like <soap> ... </soap>.

Have not thought about consequences of alternative 

At any rate I would like to see if there is any interest 
in exploring these alternatives. Anyone up for it? 

More information about the JDev mailing list