[JDEV] Proposed JPG Contents

Robert Temple robert.temple at dig.com
Wed Apr 18 01:14:09 CDT 2001

I often find that overlap is good in docs.  Especially if the overlap
is by two different people.   If for some reason the first isn't clear,
the 2nd often clears things up.  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter at jabber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:01 AM
> To: jdev at jabber.org; docs-dev at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Proposed JPG Contents
> temas wrote:
> > 
> > Here's the first draft at a new JPG Contents I'll be working on.  I
> > would love some feedback, especially in the Transport and Server dev
> > areas, I left them kind of vague and empty right now.
> I'm curious what the feeling of the group is on the relative value of
> the Jabber Programmers Guide (JPG) vs. the Jabber Protocol Overview
> (JPO). It seems to me that we've got quite a bit of overlap 
> and that it
> might behoove us to merge these docs in some way so we don't have
> duplication of effort and content (especially given the need for new
> docs such as a client-developer's guide and so on).
> Any thoughts?
> Peter
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> stpeter at jabber.org
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev

More information about the JDev mailing list