[JDEV] New Patent Policy at W3C
adamtheo at theoretic.com
Mon Oct 1 03:54:47 CDT 2001
> What this means is that the W3C can create a recommendation that becomes
> a defato web standard and any implementation will/may have to pay
well, technically, yes. but i seriously doubt they would ever charge
fees to use their standards. what they are doing here is trying to
resolve any IP disputs that have/could pop up. disputs such as "if Apple
contributes to a w3c spec, who owns that IP? Apple, or the w3c?". i am
not familiar with the workings of thr w3c, but i imagine this is a
result of some trouble in the past where a corporation contributor has
tried to claim IP on part of a w3c standard they helped to create.
so i don't think this is the w3c trying to get licensing fees, but
rather them trying to stop it.
one of my fav. websites explains it:
> Should the Jabber specifications and any derived work be placed in a
> 'Patent Free Zone' OR do folks believe that Patents are the foundation
> of our IP (Intellectual Property) industry.
well, my personal belief is very pro-IP. i see Patents as overall a good
thing, although need to be rationalized out again in the courts.
but, on the matter of jabber: jabber itself, patent free, of course. but
technologies that use jabber, such as middleware components, etc...
could be patented, i think... nothing stopping them as long as they
don't try to claim jabber protocol itself.
/\ Adam Theo, Age 22, Tallahassee FL USA.
//\\ Theoretic Solutions (http://www.theoretic.com)
//--\\ "Activism, Software, and Internet Services".
|| Personal Homepage (http://www.theoretic.com/adamtheo).
|| Jabber Platform (http://www.jabber.org).
Birthright Online (http://www.birthright.net).
Email & Jabber: adamtheo at theoretic.com
AIM: AdamTheo2000 ICQ: 3617306 Y!: AdamTheo2
"A patriotic American progressive buddhist
with free-market socialist views"
More information about the JDev