[jdev] RE: [Standards] Re: compliance levels for 2008

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Sat May 5 15:56:04 CDT 2007

On 5 May 2007, at 10:13, Sander Devrieze wrote:
> I vote for the basic PEP XEP and do not specifically require any of
> the XEPs that require PEP (like User Avatar)

I think PEP is an enabler XEP, you never use PEP on its own, so if we  
don't require anything which is based on PEP I'm not sure it makes  
sense for us to require PEP itself (although I do think it should be  
required through an avatar dependency).

Kevin Smith
Psi XMPP Client Project Leader (http://psi-im.org)

More information about the JDev mailing list