[jdev] new-style session request
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Mar 5 10:41:02 CST 2008
Travis Shirk wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:24 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Indeed, it's not 100% clear that we need *any* stream re-openings, and
>> that's something we might want to put into rfc3920bis for improved
>> efficiency during stream negotiation. Or at least discuss.
> I agree that reopening the stream is just syntactic sugar since it
> really enforces nothing, but maybe a better option would be that the new
> list of features is sent after each one is negotiated?
Well sure, that's how it's supposed to work right now. Is some software
not doing that?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the JDev