[jdev] Presence of type "available" not allowed?
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sun May 4 22:21:50 CDT 2008
On 05/04/2008 11:35 AM, Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
> Remko Tronçon pisze:
>>> 1. Modify existing documentation and implementations to a more strict
>>> behavior that would treat values not mentionned in RFC 3921 as illegal.
>> most implementations just ignore an unknown type and treat it as
>> 'available', which i think is a sensible thing to do.
> On the other hand, ignoring undefined type 'invisible' and treating it
> as normal available presence may be considered evil by some people.
Which is why we need to define a real protocol for invisibility. Here is
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the JDev