[jdev] Invisibility. Was: Presence of type "available" not allowed?
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat May 10 08:13:11 CDT 2008
On 05/10/2008 3:40 AM, Andreas Monitzer wrote:
> On May 10, 2008, at 00:25, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
>> But backing to the topic...
>> Did you have any time to look at my proposal of layered privacy lists?
>> This could serve as a base for an easier for clients XEP-0126
> Yes, right now for implementing XEP-0126, you have to do some AI magic
> to get it to work, when you assume that the user might have set up a
> privacy list that has to be honored even when the user is invisible
> (which is a valid assumption). That was a no-go for me when I looked at
> implementing it for Adium.
Right. That's why I think XEP-0186 is a very useful shortcut around the
madness of invisibility based on privacy lists (even if in some server
implementations the two might use the same backend).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the JDev