[jdev] Monthly XMPP Meeting
js-jdev at webkeks.org
Wed Mar 11 12:15:41 CDT 2009
Am 11.03.2009 um 18:10 schrieb Dave Cridland:
> No, you're signalling your availability to stpeter. That
> availability is allowed to be different to your general
> availability, this is true. And because of the interaction between
> directed presence and the roster, things can get complicated.
I could also send an unavailable and it would be the same problem.
> I don't think that renders directed presence useless.
Well, imagine this situation: I send a presence with <show>dnd</show>.
Then my client sets me auto away and later I return. So it sends a
global available presence with no show. No peter seems me again. But I
sent a directed presence because I wanted that he thinks I'm busy and
doesn't bother me (sorry you have to be our example here, Peter ;)).
But this is renderes useless by the global presence. IMO, a global
presence should not replace a directed presence. At least not until
you send a global unavailable presence or tell the server some other
way that you don't want that directed presence anymore.
PS: No need to send to me directly and the list, I'm subscribed :).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
More information about the JDev