[jdev] The future of Jabber/XMPP?
xramtsov at gmail.com
Fri Aug 27 10:12:04 CDT 2010
27.08.2010 23:14, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> XEP doesn't forbid such behaviour, as I posted above.
> Hmm, we need to make it explicit that this is forbidden then. The
> whole reason that PEP exists was to avoid spamming of extended
> Thanks for pointing out that this wasn't 100% clear in the spec.
Good move, Remko. Now ejabberd will violate your synthetic rules for sure.
I'm completely disappointed in XSF: noone cares about implementations
feedback anymore, it is much more funny to flame implementation wars
instead of make all implementations happy.
So we ended from what we started: PEP doesn't scale.
Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne.
xmpp:xram at jabber.ru.
More information about the JDev