[jdev] Are you broken?
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Apr 14 18:37:34 UTC 2011
On 4/14/11 12:33 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> So, as an experiment, I changed by SRV records the other day - mostly to
> test our own handling.
> I now have:
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> _xmpp-server._tcp.dave.cridland.net. 86400 IN SRV 5 1 5269
> _xmpp-server._tcp.dave.cridland.net. 86400 IN SRV 9 1 5269
> In layman's terms, that's "Try connecting to peirce-6, and if that
> fails, try peirce-4".
> Predictably, these are IPv6 and IPv4 single-stack hostnames:
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> peirce-6.dave.cridland.net. 86400 IN AAAA
> peirce-4.dave.cridland.net. 86400 IN A 126.96.36.199
> Actually the same host, as you can see:
> peirce.dave.cridland.net. 86400 IN A 188.8.131.52
> peirce.dave.cridland.net. 86400 IN AAAA
> So the question is, can anyone not "see" me?
> An easy way to check is by discoing my server.
> So far, I have found two server implementations that can no longer see me.
I don't know that this is "broken" so much as "liberal in what you
accept". RFC 3920 was ambiguous on whether to fall back to A/AAAA
lookups if SRV failed, but leaned toward doing fallback even if SRV
failed. RFC 6120 is more strict in this regard.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the JDev