[Operators] Recent Google XMPP Federation problems
Arnaud Abélard
arnaud.abelard at univ-nantes.fr
Sun Feb 24 14:21:31 CST 2008
David Horwitz wrote:
>
>
>
>> Actually, i just noticed something bad, bad, bad from google. When
>> activating Google Apps For Teams Edition, it actives gtalk
>> automatically for the domain, so i guess the rerouting behavior was
>> understandable in my case. I just disabled it, and hope we'll see some
>> change in a few hours/days.
>>
>
> What does it take to activate this? Do you need to supply come kind on
> domain ownership? Otherwise this is very bad (any one of our 26K+ staff
> or students could kill our XMPP federation)
>
Yeah, of course. They ask you to prove you own or manage the domain by
either setting a cname redirecting to google.com or uploading a special
html page to your domain. But in my case, someone tried to activate apps
for our domain, so i had to prove I was the owner but for some reason
never got access to the administration area until I requested it today.
That's when i noticed that gtalk was activated by default, even before
anyone had access to the administration pages, which is bad!
Arnaud
>
>
> David
>
>
>> On another note, it would be indeed usefull to have a modus operandi
>> for XMPP Federation related problem reporting with google.
>>
>>
>> Arnaud
>>
>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> Arnaud Abélard wrote:
>>>> Justin Uberti wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix went into production today. XMPP Federation should be
>>>>> working normally for all domains.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for this update Justin. Is it normal that I can
>>>> not see anything change in the situation yet? Google still seem not
>>>> to be able to reach our domain.
>>>>
>>>> The explanation you gave made me think about the fact we activated
>>>> google apps team edition on our domain to give it a try but we never
>>>> meant to enable gtalk for it. Our domain already has its XMPP
>>>> service running properly with the right SRV entries and all. I
>>>> didn't think that all our XMPP trafic would be rerouted back to
>>>> google or is that actually the problem the fix was supposed to,
>>>> well...fix?
>>>>
>>>> Am I the only one not noticing any improvement yet?
>>>>
>>>> AA.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --justin
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Keith Burgoyne
>>>>> <keith at silverorange.com <mailto:keith at silverorange.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for getting back to us Justin. We appreciate your efforts!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin Uberti wrote:
>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > There's been some discussion on this list about recent changes
>>>>> > regarding XMPP Federation at Google, and wanted to provide some
>>>>> > information on this issue.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The recent launch of Google Apps Team Edition caused a
>>>>> problem that
>>>>> > broke XMPP Federation for some domains. In a nutshell, the
>>>>> issue was
>>>>> > that certain domains were being treated as if they were
>>>>> hosted at
>>>>> > Google, as opposed to being federated with Google. This
>>>>> prevented
>>>>> XMPP
>>>>> > packets from being routed properly.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A fix has been identified and existing federated domains
>>>>> should start
>>>>> > working again soon. The fix also prevents the problem from
>>>>> happening
>>>>> > in the future with new federated domains. I'll send another
>>>>> update
>>>>> > when the fix is live in production.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Justin Uberti
>>>>> > Tech Lead
>>>>> > Google
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
--
Arnaud Abélard (jabber: arnaud.abelard at univ-nantes.fr)
Administrateur Système
Centre de Ressources Informatiques
Université de Nantes
-
ne pas utiliser: trapemail at univ-nantes.fr
More information about the Operators
mailing list