[Operators] requiring channel encryption
Jonathan Schleifer
js-xog at webkeks.org
Thu May 1 08:13:37 CDT 2008
Jesse Thompson <jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Yes, I agree with that. But you give the vast majority of users too
> much credit when you assume that they know they should be using TLS.
> Most users blindly assume that the service administrator or client
> developer will not give them something that isn't secure.
You're right. Maybe we should agree that s2s TLS is as c2s TLS. Both
should be mandatory, otherwise there's always a hole where messages
could be intercepted.
--
Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/attachments/20080501/d8d88d97/attachment.pgp
More information about the Operators
mailing list