[Operators] Rosters flood
jesse.thompson at doit.wisc.edu
Wed Sep 8 10:19:56 CST 2010
On 09/08/2010 10:30 AM, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
> 09.09.2010 01:22, Jesse Thompson пишет:
>> Has anyone ever suggested the idea of clients and/or servers
>> implementing features to not deliver, or segregate, messages from
>> users that aren't subscribed to each others presences?
> There is a problem with subscriptions: you cannot block them efficiently using roster mechanism.
I consider subscription requests to be less dangerous than messages
since they don't have malicious payloads. It seem like a win if the
larger issue of stopping spam messages can be solved with tighter
requirements for subscriptions.
Do you mean that spammers could flood users with subscription requests?
I suppose that would be difficult to deal with. Could it be solved
with UI improvements? e.g., a queue listing of pending requests, as
opposed to a pop-up for each request.
Or are you talking about a different problem?
> Another problem is MUC (for obvious reasons).
Right. I don't have a good idea for stopping MUC spam.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3403 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Operators